That was quick!

I received a response from Mr. Gustavson twenty minutes after sending my query. When I saw the address, I assumed it was an auto-responder. Here’s his answer:

From: John Gustavson
Subject: FW: Regarding the letter to the editor
To: Rick Pali
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 13:38:12 -0400

Dear Mr. Pali,

Thank you very much for your e-mail. You are absolutely correct. Once a consumer has notified a company or organization not to call them then the organization must comply, even if exempt from the DNC. I was referring in my letter to the general case where a consumer has not previously withdrawn consent and a marketer can call customers even if they have registered on the DNC. Until reading your e-mail it hadn’t occurred to me that my letter might be interpreted as asserting a right to call after consent to do so had been withdrawn. I will be more careful in my phrasing in future and thank you for drawing this to my attention.

Sincerely,

John Gustavson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Canadian Marketing Association
1 Concorde Gate, Suite 607, Don Mills, Ontario M3C 3N6
(416) 644-3756 | www.the-cma.org

I have some thoughts about this, but they’ll have to wait until later.

This entry was posted in consumer life, privacy. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. Shawn
    Posted April 14, 2008 at 08:13 | Permalink

    Damn impressive!!!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

*
*